Physician Certification for Medical Necessity

Physician Certification for Medical Necessity

Article Apr 30, 2007

     "Physician Certification Statements," "Certificates of Medical Necessity"-whatever you call them, they are required for almost any non-emergent transport. I have voiced my frustrations with these forms in the past, most recently in the April issue of EMS Magazine in response to a letter to the editor asking about liability for false certifications where medical necessity is not actually met. In my response, I pointed out that the ambulance supplier is required by law to independently assess the patient, and it is the ambulance supplier who swears to medical necessity when he submits the bill. Therefore, generally speaking, the suppliers will be held liable for any "false" certification, not the doctor or nurse who signed the form. This barely scratches the surface of this sticky topic. In this column, I want to dig deeper into the problems that are inherent with this required form.

You vs. the Doc
     What happens when a doctor certifies medical necessity and your independent assessment is contrary to the doctor's conclusion? The potential legal liability for going against a doctor's order would be huge if, in fact, you denied the patient ambulance transport and something happened to him while traveling by other means. The offending ambulance company would be attacked by the plaintiff's lawyer for letting its EMT make the decision to oppose a doctor's medical order (the doctor might weigh in on that attack, as well). On the other hand, you cannot submit a bill for the patient based on the doctor's statement that the patient requires an ambulance if you know that is not true. What about having the patient sign an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form? ABN forms are used when a service is not "reasonable and necessary," which does not apply to these transports, since the service may still be considered reasonable. That leaves you with either providing the service for free or getting the patient to agree to pay when his insurance denies the charges.

     I received an e-mail a short time back asking about the content of these forms, which is another problematic issue. Of course, there is no standard form. In fact, Medicare has specifically refused to create a standardized form. So, what should these forms say, and who should fill them out? I am not aware of any rule or policy that says the form cannot be filled out by someone other than the physician before they sign. Of course, nothing should be added after the signature, and therein lies another problem. If it is not filled out by the doctor (i.e., in one pen or handwriting), or printed out with all the information on it at one time (i.e., from your computer), it is difficult to ascertain whether the information was on the form before or after the signature.

     Also, since it is technically the doctor's statement, it is better to have it in his or her own words (as opposed to his reading someone else's conclusions and then ratifying them by his signature), and it will have more weight later on and, hopefully, be more medically sound if you can get the physician to give a specific reason why an ambulance is necessary versus any other type of transportation (that is the purpose of the form, after all), but this is where most of the forms fall short. They tend to be a recitation of the patient's history, or simply a statement that the patient could only travel by stretcher. But, you must show why the patient needed a stretcher and ambulance; therefore, merely stating a patient's medical history is usually not enough.

     The best course of action is to have a doctor fill out the form and, in his own words, state why this particular patient, for this time frame, cannot travel in a wheelchair van or by other means. Absent that, you can fill out the form and/or make a list of items the doctor can choose from to check off and then present it to the doctor to do the rest. However, this often leads to no information at all, other than a signature.

     At the end of the day, I have rarely reviewed a physician certification form that actually draws a significant, fact-based medical conclusion on a patient that helps support the justification for the trip, and in conducting responses to audits and overpayment assessments on behalf of my clients, I have seen thousands of them. These statements could be helpful if they were done right. In fact, I am in the process of arguing that these certificates, when obtained from a doctor prior to transport, can be relied on to support the transport, contrary to Medicare's current policies. As things stand now, while you are required to get these forms signed, you cannot rely on them to justify the need for transport. So, are they worth the paper they're written on? It doesn't seem so to me.

G. Christopher Kelly is an attorney practicing in Atlanta, GA. Chris focuses on federal laws and regulations as they relate to the healthcare industry and specifically to the ambulance industry. He also lectures and advises ambulance company clients across the U.S. Contact him at

The drones are used to improve scene management by assessing areas that are difficult or dangerous for personnel to reach.
Dozens of firefighters and police officers join the annual week-long Brotherhood Ride to honor 20 first responders who have died in the line of duty in Florida.
The event will be held on August 20, with all proceeds going to Narberth Ambulance, an agency that provides emergency services to 145,000 residents.
Speakers presented on topics such as disaster relief, emerging pathogens, the opioid crisis and cyber security.
The state's Department of Health has established an agreement for UNC and NCBP to collaborate on providing public health data to NEMSIS to better prepare EMS for national emergencies.
State troopers rendered aid before turning them over to responding EMS units and New Castle County Paramedics.
Three people were fatally shot and at least 21 others were wounded in separate attacks from Saturday morning to early Sunday.
Crestline Coach attended the Eighth Annual Saskatchewan Health & Safety Leadership conference on June 8 to publicly sign the “Mission: Zero” charter on behalf of the organization, its employees and their families.
ImageTrend, Inc. announced the winners of the 2017 Hooley Awards, which recognize those who are serving in a new or innovative way to meet the needs of their organization, including developing programs or solutions to benefit providers, administrators, or the community.
Firefighters trained with the local hospital in a drill involving a chemical spill, practicing a decontamination process and setting up a mass casualty tent for patient treatment.
Many oppose officials nationwide who propose limiting Narcan treatment on patients who overdose multiple times to save city dollars, saying it's their job to save lives, not to play God.
While it's unclear what exact substance they were exposed to while treating a patient for cardiac arrest, two paramedics, an EMT and a fire chief were observed at a hospital after experiencing high blood pressure, rapid heartbeat, and mood changes.
After a forest fire broke out, students, residents and nursing home residents were evacuated and treated for light smoke inhalation before police started allowing people to return to their buildings.
AAA’s Stars of Life program celebrates the contributions of ambulance professionals who have gone above and beyond the call of duty in service to their communities or the EMS profession.