When was the last time you took a class just for your own benefit?
Not your patient, not your employer, not your town/agency, not your regulatory agency—just you?
After 30 years in the field (during which time I’ve been assaulted, shot at, bounced around the “back of the bus,” subjected to other assorted evils and even broken a med box with my head), I’m happy to say there’s now a program from the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians (NAEMT) that addresses the issue of safety.
As EMS providers, we are twice as likely to be injured doing our job as any other public safety provider. The newly developed EMS Safety Course, developed by EMS providers for EMS providers, looks to change that.
The members of the developmental committee are experienced (let’s not say “old”) folks—they’ve been there, done that and got the T-shirt. They’re from every branch of the EMS family tree—fire, private, volunteer and third services—and from across the country.
The desire to prevent a new generation of providers from suffering through the same trials which befell us “oldsters” is not a single district problem. It pervades the entire industry, which is why NAEMT is the perfect organization to take on such a project. And the EMS Safety Course could prove to be a game changer. It seeks to actively change the culture of accepting an inordinate amount of risk that permeates the industry. The course addresses the following areas:
- Crew resource management
- Emergency vehicle safety
- Patient handling
- Patient, practitioner and bystander safety
- Personal health.
When I started (in the days of the covered wagon), we never wore gloves, we performed mouth-to-mouth and we used DeLee suction devices that were powered by mouth.
We learned, we changed, we moved on—just not far enough.
Now it’s time for us to take the next step forward and not just protect our patients but also ourselves.
Keeping the Next Generation Safe
I still work for a fire-based regional paramedic unit, but my real love is being technical director for Massachusetts Institute of Technology EMS. These young folks are dynamic, exciting, energetic and filled with enthusiasm. However, what keeps me up at night is not the occasional silliness that occurs on college campuses, not the possible missteps in treatment, nor the possible disagreements which occur with other agencies or people. No, it’s that one day I’ll have to talk to the parents of one of my charges to explain how they were injured while working on MIT’s ambulance.
I would do anything to minimize this risk, so when the EMS Safety Course became available I took advantage of it for MIT-EMS. The class was run as a continuing education program and was approved by the Massachusetts Department of Emergency Medical Services for continuing education credit. The course materials and cards were very reasonably priced and the costs associated with the class were covered under budget items. I believe anyone could run the program for less than $50 per person. When we ran it, we offered Boston EMS some slots in the program and they had the foresight to send some of their senior staff, whose experience was greatly appreciated, to participate.
Through teaching the course I found that it, at least temporarily, changes the culture. Even though safety has always been encouraged, the age of the students and the influence of outside employment often were at odds with the procedures. With the addition of the EMS Safety Course (and input of senior personnel) we hope to instill more of the culture of safety that the program espouses. Using spotters while backing (although long a requirement of the service) seems to have increased in frequency. Rear-seat belt use has increased. And students’ attitudes have changed. “We (like to) think we’re safe all the time. This course changed my perspective,” says Dylan Soukup, an EMT with MIT-EMS.