Skip to main content
Patient Care

Preventing Medical Errors: Communication Is King

In this three-part series, EMS World examines medical errors and preventable harm in prehospital and in-hospital settings. Medical errors are preventable events caused by procedural or communicative mistakes resulting in physical harm to or death of the patient. This series covers root causes of medical errors and how to implement measures to prevent them from occurring. The criticality of this systemic problem is indicated by a 2016 study conducted by Johns Hopkins University of Medicine, which contends that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S., citing “communication breakdowns, diagnostic errors, poor judgment, and inadequate skill” as primary causes of error. The study’s data revealed an estimated 400,000 deaths occur every year in the U.S. as a result of medical error.

In Part 1 of the series, James Woodson, MD, FACEP and CEO of Pulsara, a provider of mobile communication network software for healthcare systems, discusses his vision of reducing patient harm and treatment times. He believes that systems can benefit from utilizing platforms that centralize information that can be accessed by every healthcare provider who comes in contact with a patient, from prehospital to definitive care providers. This type of accessibility allows for a clearer, organized network of communication to reduce the chances of providers being misinformed or misheard during transitions of care.

Communication is King

According to Woodson, the main contributing factors of medical errors can be broken down into three categories: people (attitudes, understanding, willingness, etc.), process (focusing on a protocol that will decrease variance and variability) and tools (e.g. documenting communication, technology, and mnemonics to assist decision-making and care). It’s crucial to identify areas in relation to these factors that are vulnerable to communication problems that could lead to patient harm.

“Communication is where the lion's share of the problems is,” says Woodson. “I personally don't believe we teach communication and emphasize its importance enough in healthcare.”

In the tools realm, Woodson’s mindset regarding this problem revolves around the 80/15/5 rule: 80% of the implementation of new technology is affected by people, 15% by the process, and only 5% by technology—and with people comprising the vast majority of that implementation, interpersonal miscommunication tends to be the number one source of error.

“You have to choose the correct technology and solution and wrap the people and process around to link them together,” he says. “People, process, and technology are interrelated. You can't talk about one without the others.”

When it comes to process, Woodson says this part needs to be standardized in order to “decrease variance and variability within our systems of care.” Because our healthcare system is so fragmented, often standards don’t exist across different organizations. “That makes no sense because there's no way any individual can get everything right—encode the message, deliver it, get through all the noise in the emergency department, get it to the receiving person on a verbal report knowing that many care team members are not in the room for that handoff.”

The process of sharing information between providers is like “a telephone game. The further away you get from the original source, the more prone you are to errors,” Woodson says. And since EMS is often the primary source of information, the bedside handoff is the point that carries the highest risk of miscommunication.

“You're bringing together two very different workflows and cultures, and you have to transmit the communication and information through massive amounts of noise and very chaotic environments,” he says.

Woodson stresses that EMS must be considered as critical to the system as any other in-hospital components are. “EMS is an access node to healthcare, they're not just transport. They need to be part of the team,” he says, emphasizing that the critical information EMS provides to the charge nurse must be easily accessible to the emergency physician and other downstream clinicians, especially if they need to contact the medics for clarification on that information.

“One of the key principles of dealing with medical error in patient safety is the concept ‘to err is human.’ Nobody is perfect,” he says. People aren’t always going to accurately convey information the first time around, so it’s critical “to be connected in such a way that you can circle back and get clarification. Right now, we're blinded. EMS drops off the patient. It's near impossible to get back in touch with that medic. That makes no sense with today's technology.”

Woodson strives to get the people and the process working together to help “analyze communication as a whole,” particularly during patient handoffs to ensure all measures are being taken to prevent harm. Documentation systems can be conducive to this but not as comprehensively because entering data is time-consuming. Platforms that allow for real-time data input eliminate multiple verbal handoffs that can easily lead to miscommunicating critical pieces of information. His “vision is to link teams together for real-time communication so it can cross multiple different healthcare organizations and all downstream team members” because “uniting team members can massively reduce treatment times, which leads to better outcomes and improved ROI for hospitals, patients, and payors—everyone involved.”

The people in your organization have to be on board for the new culture when implementing a process in order for it to be successful. An excessive amount of variance and variability exists across organizations’ protocols and methods of communication, opening the door for mistakes to occur. The healthcare industry is talking about data interoperability right now, says Woodson, but we have to be looking at the interoperability of communications. “If we're using all of these archaic communication technologies—fax, email, pagers, face-to-face—we are asking for problems, period. There is no possibility of interoperability of those.”

Teaching the Fundamentals

Imagine you’re a basketball coach, says Woodson, who teaches players in offense and defense but never focuses on dribbling skills—a foundational element to the game. “That's what we're doing in healthcare right now when it comes to communication.” He argues communication should be “considered the fundamental patient care skill. We have to incorporate basic communication skills into our training sessions. Not just the ‘cool’ stuff.”

Granted, learning how to perform cricothyrotomies is much cooler than learning how to effectively communicate. However, “if you just focus on offense and defense, the cool, sexy stuff, you're going to struggle [because] when we have so many things competing for our attention—so many means of communication, so many alerts—we become overwhelmed and when everything is critical, nothing is critical.”

Teaching providers how to handle all of that noise is key to maintaining smooth communications. It’s no secret that there are strained relationships between some EMS professionals and emergency department staff—medics tend to feel ignored by ED staff while ED staff tend to believe medics provide poor reports. Woodson says there are two key actions that can efficiently address this communication problem during the handoff.

“The first thing is active listening, which means you have to pause, focus and really calm things down,” he says. “The second is having some form of documentation of the communication encounter.” If medics can quickly enter audio clips, video clips, and photos of the patient interaction and handoff, they’re available for everyone without having to stop and handwrite a separate short form to be left behind. “This makes a massive impact on patient safety, especially with transfers of care.”

“We have to be very intentional about teaching communication and the importance of it,” says Woodson. “So often we consider patient care as what we do to the patient instead of what we do for the patient. Communication is a core value and a cornerstone of patient safety.”

James Woodson, MD, FACEP, is a board-certified emergency physician whose passion is to serve. He is founder of Pulsara, a healthcare communication company, and the Alpine Compassion Clinic, which provides free preventative care to those in need in the East Texas Community. 

Valerie Amato, NREMT, is assistant editor of EMS World. Reach her at vamato@emsworld.com.

Back to Top