EMS 3.0 Transformation Summit: Jumping on the MIH-CP Bandwagon

EMS 3.0 Transformation Summit: Jumping on the MIH-CP Bandwagon

By Valerie Amato, EMT Apr 21, 2018

In his presentation “The Incubator for Innovation and Transformation” at NAEMT’s EMS 3.0 Transformation Summit in Arlington, VA, Daniel Felton, director of State Government Relations of Philips Healthcare, discussed how agencies can determine if a mobile integrated healthcare and community paramedicine program (MIH-CP) is a viable option for their communities.

Philips Healthcare plays an important role in the EMS industry as a seller of providers’ routinely used devices such as AEDs and prescription monitoring systems. Felton’s involvement in this arena sparked his interest in the growing field of MIH-CP. He began studying state-level trends of MIH-CP programs being implemented in the United States, and learned that 2015 was a pivotal year in the way laws started changing to allow for MIH-CP. Between 2011 and 2014, only one law was passed each year accommodating for MIH-CP. Then, in 2015, 10 laws were enacted, followed by 8 in 2016, 7 in 2017, and more than 10 are currently pending for 2018.

Legislation is a key element in the establishment of these programs since certain state policies can prohibit or limit their capabilities. In total, 45 MIH-CP bills in 20 states and Washington, D.C. were considered between 2015 and 2016, and 44 bills in 21 states were considered in 2017 and 2018. Felton provided an overview of several states included in this movement—in California, successful pilot CP programs set the stage for legislators to get the ball rolling on a bill (now in progress) that would enable permanent CP programs. Florida is looking at nonemergency alternative treatment options for EMTs to employ, while Hawaii is planning to initiate a three-year CP pilot program to test the waters. As Maryland studies data on MIH before deciding on enacting a law accommodating for it, Minnesota is seeking creative ways to implement CP to serve various areas in need, such as opioid addiction treatment arrangements and other alternative health care delivery systems.

There are a variety of policies to consider when implementing an MIH-CP framework into a community’s healthcare system. Who will provide medical direction? How will your state define what a community paramedic is and how will one obtain licensure? Can your state define MIH-CP in a way that makes it coincide with current state protocols? These questions, along with topics like provider and patient liability, data collection, and funding, must be taken into consideration.

But still, the overarching challenge is legislation: are there existing laws or regulations that prohibit an MIH-CP program? If so, they will likely need to be amended in order to accommodate for your state’s scope of practice. Felton says that proof reports “give legislators comfort in knowing the issue is bonafide, it’s real, and there’s data to back it up.”

The public also wants to see evidence that MIH-CP is a worthwhile endeavor, as the added support will help drive legislation forward. Of course, it’s important to devise a sustainable strategy for funding before bringing a proposal to the table. Some EMS programs are eating the costs of their MIH-CP programs, some are receiving Medicaid reimbursements while others have acquired state and federal grants. Know what your agency is capable of handling financially and determine how you can fill the gaps.

Ultimately, however, you want your legislators and elected officials to understand the benefits of MIH-CP for the end user. They’re “relying on you to educate them” on why this is a necessary pursuit for your community, says Felton.

“If you’re not sitting at the table, you might end up on the table,” Felton says, emphasizing the importance of getting involved and knowing your “enemies”—those who simply have differing opinions (or have yet to establish one)—so you can present your case effectively with an understanding of their perspective.

For more data on MIH-CP trends in the United States, check out NAEMT’s national survey document.

The crew is available 24/7 and responds to calls from medical providers, schools, the Safe Station program and individuals seeking help.
A Montana film crew is following the Santa Fe Fire Department's mobile health care team to document the benefits of community paramedicine.
Texas program lowered readmissions and cut nonemergent 9-1-1 calls using community paramedics.
The Birmingham Fire and Rescue C.A.R.E.S. program changed how Ben Thompson approached patient care, especially with frequent flyers.
The landscape of EMS is changing to an integrative and preventive model. The Virginia OEMS wants to help lead it there.
Ready Responders will consist of two paramedics responding to non-urgent 9-1-1 calls to ease the burden on emergency departments.
The deputy chief of operations at New Orleans EMS tailored his talk to local providers.
The partnership will deliver remote care management services to reduce costs for patients and healthcare organizations.
Haywood Regional Medical Center is developing the initiative with the county to cut down on hospital readmissions.
Portland is reaching out to residents struggling with addiction through community paramedics instead of jail time.
EMS providers are used to delivering one message, one time, to one place. But community paramedics must get comfortable with continued dialogue among a patient's entire care team. Technology can help.
Can fire-based MIH become a fiscally sustainable model? More important, does it improve the health of communities?
Memphis Fire Department Lt. Kevin Spratlin will cover the city's community paramedicine innovations.
Daniel Felton discusses how to overcome the legislative hurdles of establishing MIH-CP in your community.
Since medical emergencies comprise 87% of their calls, Albuquerque Fire Department hopes the program will more efficiently address their responses to those calls.